Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
574946 | Journal of Chemical Health and Safety | 2006 | 14 Pages |
Abstract
It is recommended that the safety analyst explicitly evaluate the strengths and limitations of any code before selecting it for a specific application. User skill and expertise can often outweigh most of the differences between ALOHA and EPIcode. Recognizing that EPIcode is inherently a scoping tool, while ALOHA is based on more detailed models, the user is recommended to perform a parameter sensitivity study to determine major dependences in the applied model and to check code output with independent techniques, such as a hand calculation, alternative computer code application, or spreadsheet techniques. A multi-tiered approach of this type will provide better confidence in overall results than to unilaterally use one code alone without questioning.
Related Topics
Physical Sciences and Engineering
Chemical Engineering
Chemical Health and Safety
Authors
D.C. Thoman, K.R. O'Kula, J.C. Laul, M.W. Davis, K.D. Knecht,