Article ID Journal Published Year Pages File Type
5764660 Deep Sea Research Part I: Oceanographic Research Papers 2017 36 Pages PDF
Abstract
The trend of the calibrations diverges markedly from the slope of experimental critical erosion and deposition flow speeds versus grain-size, making it unlikely that the SS¯ (or any deposit size for that matter) is simply predicted by the deposition threshold. A more probable control is the rate of deposition of the different size fractions under changing flows over several tens of years (the typical averaging period of a centimetre of deposited sediment). This suggestion is supported by a simple depositional model for which the deposited SS¯ is calculated from measured currents with a size-varying depositional threshold. More surficial sediment samples taken near long-term current meter sites are needed to make calibrations more robust and explore regional differences.
Related Topics
Physical Sciences and Engineering Earth and Planetary Sciences Geology
Authors
, , ,