Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
5764660 | Deep Sea Research Part I: Oceanographic Research Papers | 2017 | 36 Pages |
Abstract
The trend of the calibrations diverges markedly from the slope of experimental critical erosion and deposition flow speeds versus grain-size, making it unlikely that the SS¯ (or any deposit size for that matter) is simply predicted by the deposition threshold. A more probable control is the rate of deposition of the different size fractions under changing flows over several tens of years (the typical averaging period of a centimetre of deposited sediment). This suggestion is supported by a simple depositional model for which the deposited SS¯ is calculated from measured currents with a size-varying depositional threshold. More surficial sediment samples taken near long-term current meter sites are needed to make calibrations more robust and explore regional differences.
Related Topics
Physical Sciences and Engineering
Earth and Planetary Sciences
Geology
Authors
I.N. McCave, D.J.R. Thornalley, I.R. Hall,