Article ID Journal Published Year Pages File Type
577728 Journal of Hazardous Materials 2012 8 Pages PDF
Abstract
While the MBR treatment generally showed only a low degradation capacity for persistent pharmaceuticals, much better degradation was obtained by applying UV irradiation and H2O2 as AOP. The “conventional” cost-benefit analysis of the different technology options taking into account both electrical energy consumption and pharmaceutical removal efficiency, revealed clearly better performance of low pressure UV lamps as AOP. However, a holistic comparison between the different scenarios was carried out by evaluating their environmental impacts using the life cycle assessment (LCA) methodology. Decisive advantages were highlighted to include this approach in the decision making process.
Related Topics
Physical Sciences and Engineering Chemical Engineering Chemical Health and Safety
Authors
, , , , , ,