Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
579120 | Journal of Hazardous Materials | 2011 | 12 Pages |
Abstract
⺠The efficiency of Apatite II⢠increases as the acidity decreases, then the application of apatite-based materials for metal removal treatments should be restricted to slightly acid to neutral waters. ⺠Because of the preferred process of using phosphate ions to form metal-phosphate precipitates, the mixture with other sources of alkalinity, such as limestone, is proposed to extend the duration of Apatite IIâ¢. ⺠Compared with other reactive materials such as limestone and caustic magnesia that exhibit a reduction of porosity Apatite II⢠showed stable hydraulic performance. ⺠The extrapolation of the column durabilities to a 1-m-thick passive treatment suggests that the Apatite II⢠filling can be active between 5 and 10 years for an inflow pH exceeding 5.
Related Topics
Physical Sciences and Engineering
Chemical Engineering
Chemical Health and Safety
Authors
Josep Oliva, Joan De Pablo, José-Luis Cortina, Jordi Cama, Carlos Ayora,