Article ID Journal Published Year Pages File Type
5855943 Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology 2016 12 Pages PDF
Abstract

•Summary of sources of existing bacterial mutagenicity and carcinogenicity data.•Description of how to combine (Q)SAR results.•Discussion of when an expert review might be useful.•Outline of expert review considerations.•Discussion of the scope and format for the (Q)SAR documentation.

The ICH M7 guideline describes a consistent approach to identify, categorize, and control DNA reactive, mutagenic, impurities in pharmaceutical products to limit the potential carcinogenic risk related to such impurities. This paper outlines a series of principles and procedures to consider when generating (Q)SAR assessments aligned with the ICH M7 guideline to be included in a regulatory submission. In the absence of adequate experimental data, the results from two complementary (Q)SAR methodologies may be combined to support an initial hazard classification. This may be followed by an assessment of additional information that serves as the basis for an expert review to support or refute the predictions. This paper elucidates scenarios where additional expert knowledge may be beneficial, what such an expert review may contain, and how the results and accompanying considerations may be documented. Furthermore, the use of these principles and procedures to yield a consistent and robust (Q)SAR-based argument to support impurity qualification for regulatory purposes is described in this manuscript.

Related Topics
Life Sciences Environmental Science Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis
Authors
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,