Suppression of vortex shedding and its mitigation effect in gas explosions: an experimental study

•Vortex shedding is observed behind a bluff-body in lab-scale gas explosions tests.•Two different passive flow control methods are able to suppress the shedding.•Suppression of vortex shedding can reduce the explosion overpressure by 32 ± 3%.•The modelling community should consider this when preparing their simulators.

This paper reports occurrence of vortex shedding behind bluff-bodies in gas explosions, methods to suppress them using passive flow control techniques, and their overall impact on explosion overpressures. The pressure-time histories from a series of explosion tests, using an initially quiescent propane-air mixture in a vented channel of dimensions 1.5 m × 0.28 m × 0.3 m, are presented. Selected high-speed video frames visualizing the flame propagation are also presented. Three different bluff-obstruction scenarios are considered: 1) a reference case with a single smooth circular cylinder of diameter D = 0.0157 m, 2) a single cylinder identical to that in the reference case, mounted with a splitter plate of varying length from 5.13D to 0.26D, width 17.8D and thickness 0.06D, and 3) a single helically wired cylinder with wire diameter 0.1D and pitch 4D or 8D. All circular cylinders had a length of 17.8D and were mounted normal to the direction of the flow, spanning the channel cross-section 0.5 m downstream of the ignition point. The obstructions were inserted in the rig using a unique experimental setup. The peak overpressure generated by the explosion is of main interest. Both vortex shedding suppression techniques 2) and 3) yielded significant reduction in maximum overpressures when compared to the reference cylinder case 1). While all splitter plate configurations successfully reduced the maximum explosion overpressure, the splitter plates with length 1.02D and 0.51D were the most efficient, with an average reduction in overpressure of 32 ± 3%. The helical steel wire configurations also had a significant effect, with 25 ± 3% and 20 ± 3% reduction in the maximum overpressure for pitch 4D and 8D, respectively. The high-speed video visualization further buttressed the quantitative findings in the pressure measurements and clearly showed vortex shedding suppression. The current observations imply that the contribution from vortex shedding, i.e. apart from turbulence effects, to the overpressure generation in gas explosions is significant. The modelling community must consider this while preparing their simulators.