Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
5864631 | Manual Therapy | 2016 | 6 Pages |
â¢The Chair Stand Test might not be an ideal performance-based test to assess change between pre-surgery and post-surgery.â¢The patient-reported questionnaire KOOS (subscale ADL) was best reflecting the improvement of TKR 3 months post-surgery.â¢We applied a new concept of ordering the strength of our hypotheses about the relationship between the included measures.
IntroductionThe Chair Stand Test (CST) is a frequently used performance-based test in clinical studies involving individuals with knee osteoarthritis and demonstrates good reliability.AimTo assess the construct validity of change scores of the CST compared to three other measures in patients before and after total knee replacement surgery.MethodsThe construct validity of change scores of the CST compared to the Timed Up and Go (TUG) test, the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score questionnaire (KOOS, subscale ADL) and the isometric muscle strength test of the knee extensors (IMS sum) was measured 1-2 week before and 3 months after surgery.ResultsChange (%) CST = â4.45, TUG = â2.08, KOOS ADL = 43.90, IMS sum = â13.24. Correlations CST-TUG = 0.56 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.29, 0.74), CST-KOOS = â0.31 (95% CI â0.57, 0.01), CST-IMS sum = â0.11 (95% CI â0.42, 0.22). Comparison of pairwise correlations: CST-KOOS versus CST-TUG (p < 0.0004), CST-TUG versus CST-IMS sum (p < 0.0068), CST-KOOS versus CST-IMS sum (p < 0.3100).ConclusionFor patients undergoing TKR, the CST might not be an ideal measure to assess change between pre-surgery and 3 months post-surgery. Construct validity of change scores was close to zero but the result might have been influenced by the relatively small homogeneous sample size and the chosen timespan of measurement. We ordered pairwise correlations based on the strength of correlation between the different instruments, which to our knowledge has never been done before.