Predictive Value of High Residual Platelet Reactivity by Flow Cytometry for Outcomes of Ischemic Stroke Patients on Clopidogrel Therapy

High residual platelet reactivity (HRPR) assessed by multiple tests has been associated with worse clinical outcomes. However, the clinical impact of HRPR assessed by flow cytometry is unknown. The aim of this study was to validate the predictive value of HRPR measured by flow cytometry for clinical outcomes in ischemic stroke patients during clopidogrel therapy. Overall, 198 consecutive patients with ischemic stroke taking clopidogrel underwent platelet function testing on flow cytometer including adenosine diphosphate (ADP)-induced platelet aggregation (PAg) and platelet activation markers (CD62P, CD63, and PAC-1). Poor outcome was defined as poor prognosis and ischemic events during 12-month follow-up. By receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, residual platelet reactivity assessed by flow cytometry was able to distinguish between patients with and without poor outcomes, when platelet inhibition was evaluated with ADP-PAg (area under the curve [AUC], .77; 95% confidence interval [CI], .69-.84; P < .001), CD62P (AUC, .73; 95% CI, .64-.81; P < .001), CD63 (AUC, .72; 95% CI, .64-.80; P < .001), and PAC-1 (AUC, .70; 95% CI, .62-.78; P < .001). The prevalence of HRPR was 25.8% for ADP-PAg, 32.8% for CD62P, 41.4% for CD63, and 56.1% for PAC-1. The multiple logical regression analysis demonstrated that HRPR was an independent predictor of poor outcomes (ADP-PAg: odds ratio [OR] 13.03, 95% CI 5.66-29.98, P < .001; CD62P: OR 8.55, 95% CI 3.94-18.57, P < .001; CD63: OR 8.74, 95% CI 3.89-19.64, P < .001; PAC-1: OR 4.23, 95% CI 1.98-9.08). In conclusion, HRPR, assessed by flow cytometry, is able to detect ischemic stroke patients at increased risk of 12-month poor outcomes on clopidogrel treatment.