Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
5874383 | Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases | 2013 | 4 Pages |
BackgroundApparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) thresholds are used to determine acute stroke lesion volume, but the reliability of this approach and comparability to the volume of the magnetic resonance diffusion-weighted imaging (MR-DWI) hyperintense lesion is unclear.MethodsWe prospectively recruited and clinically assessed patients who had experienced acute ischemic stroke and performed DWI less than 24 hours and at 3 to 7 days after stroke. We compared the volume of the manually outlined DW hyperintense lesion (reference standard) with lesion volumes derived from 3 commonly used ADC thresholds: .55 Ã 10â3/mm2/secondâ1, .65 Ã 10â3/mm2/secondâ1, and .75 Ã 10â3/mm2/secondâ1, with and without “editing” of erroneous tissue. We compared the volumes obtained by reference standard, “raw,” and “edited” thresholds.ResultsAmong 33 representative patients, the acute DWI lesion volume was 15,284 mm3; the median unedited/edited ADC volumes were 52,972/2786 mm3, 92,707/6,987 mm3, and 227,681/unmeasureable mm3 (.55 Ã 10â3/mm2/secondâ1, .65 Ã 10â3/mm2/secondâ1, and .75 Ã 10â3/mm2/secondâ1 thresholds, respectively). Subacute lesions gave similar differences. These differences between edited and unedited diffusion-weighted imaging and ADC volumes were statistically significant.ConclusionsThreshold-derived ADC volumes require substantial manual editing to avoid over- or underestimating the visible DWI lesion and should be used with caution.