Article ID Journal Published Year Pages File Type
5874383 Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases 2013 4 Pages PDF
Abstract

BackgroundApparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) thresholds are used to determine acute stroke lesion volume, but the reliability of this approach and comparability to the volume of the magnetic resonance diffusion-weighted imaging (MR-DWI) hyperintense lesion is unclear.MethodsWe prospectively recruited and clinically assessed patients who had experienced acute ischemic stroke and performed DWI less than 24 hours and at 3 to 7 days after stroke. We compared the volume of the manually outlined DW hyperintense lesion (reference standard) with lesion volumes derived from 3 commonly used ADC thresholds: .55 × 10−3/mm2/second−1, .65 × 10−3/mm2/second−1, and .75 × 10−3/mm2/second−1, with and without “editing” of erroneous tissue. We compared the volumes obtained by reference standard, “raw,” and “edited” thresholds.ResultsAmong 33 representative patients, the acute DWI lesion volume was 15,284 mm3; the median unedited/edited ADC volumes were 52,972/2786 mm3, 92,707/6,987 mm3, and 227,681/unmeasureable mm3 (.55 × 10−3/mm2/second−1, .65 × 10−3/mm2/second−1, and .75 × 10−3/mm2/second−1 thresholds, respectively). Subacute lesions gave similar differences. These differences between edited and unedited diffusion-weighted imaging and ADC volumes were statistically significant.ConclusionsThreshold-derived ADC volumes require substantial manual editing to avoid over- or underestimating the visible DWI lesion and should be used with caution.

Related Topics
Health Sciences Medicine and Dentistry Clinical Neurology
Authors
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,