Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
587454 | Journal of Safety Research | 2012 | 7 Pages |
IntroductionThe relationship between the relative risk of a rear-end collision during a turn, merge, or lane change maneuver and the characteristics of the rear turn-signal configuration was examined using crash data from seven states in the United States.MethodRear turn-signal characteristics—including color, optics, separation, and light source—were identified for 55 vehicle models and used in a logistic regression analysis to model the odds of a rear-end collision. Additional variables including driver demographics (gender, age), vehicle age, and light condition were also modeled. Risk was assessed using a contrast group of striking vehicles in similar collisions.ResultsThe results suggest that the odds of being the struck vehicle were 3% to 28% lower among vehicles equipped with amber versus red turn signals. Although the analysis suggests that there may be a safety benefit associated with amber rear turn signals, it is unclear whether turn-signal color alone is responsible.Impact on IndustryThe results suggest that aspects of a vehicle's rear signal characteristics may influence crash risk.
► Odds of being struck party in a rear end crash are 16% less with amber turn signals. ► Signal color or signal luminance could play a role. ► Limited evidence that LED turn signals also reduce odds of being the struck party.