Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
587456 | Journal of Safety Research | 2012 | 8 Pages |
IntroductionData availability has forced researchers to examine separately the role of alcohol among drivers who crashed and drivers who did not crash. Such a separation fails to account fully for the transition from impaired driving to an alcohol-related crash.MethodIn this study, we analyzed recent data to investigate how traffic-related environments, conditions, and drivers’ demographics shape the likelihood of a driver being either involved in a crash (alcohol impaired or not) or not involved in a crash (alcohol impaired or not). Our data, from a recent case–control study, included a comprehensive sampling of the drivers in nonfatal crashes and a matched set of comparison drivers in two U.S. locations. Multinomial logistic regression was applied to investigate the likelihood that a driver would crash or would not crash, either with a blood alcohol concentration (BAC) = .00 or with a BAC ≥ .05.ConclusionsTo our knowledge, this study is the first to examine how different driver characteristics and environmental factors simultaneously contribute to alcohol use by crash-involved and non-crash-involved drivers. This effort calls attention to the need for research on the simultaneous roles played by all the factors that may contribute to motor vehicle crashes.
► Analyses of data from a crash-control study. ► A simultaneous look at alcohol and demographics in the transition to a crash. ► Crash risk for sober drivers was largely defined by demographics and SES. ► Males were overrepresented in impaired driving and crashes. ► Females were more likely to be involved in alcohol-free crashes than male drivers.