Workplace violence among Pennsylvania education workers: Differences among occupations

ProblemThe purpose of this study was to measure the prevalence and characteristics of physical and non-physical WPV in a state-based cohort of education workers.MethodA sample of 6,450 workers was drawn using de-identified union membership lists, stratified on gender, occupation, and school location. A cross-sectional survey was mailed to participants.ResultsAn estimated 7.8% (95%CI = 6.6 − 9.1) of education workers were physically assaulted and 28.9% (95%CI = 26.4 − 31.5) experienced a non-physical WPV event during the 2009–2010 school year. Special education teachers were significantly more likely to be physically assaulted and experience a non-physical WPV event compared to general education teachers (Prevalence Rate Ratio = 3.6, 95% 2.4-5.5; PRR = 1.4, 95%CI = 1.1 − 1.8).DiscussionSpecial education teachers were at the highest risk for both physical and non-physical WPV. If not already present, schools should consider implementing comprehensive WPV prevention programs for their employees.Impact on IndustrySpecial education teachers have unique workplace hazards. Strategies that protect the special education teacher, while still protecting the special education student should be considered.

► We performed a cross-sectional survey of unionized Pennsylvania education workers. ► We asked about the prevalence, characteristics, & impact of workplace violence (WPV). ► 8% had been physically assaulted and 29% experienced a non-physical WPV event in the 2009–2010 school year. ► Special education teachers were at the highest risk for physical & non-physical WPV compared with all other education workers.