Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
5883998 | Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia | 2014 | 9 Pages |
Abstract
Although experimental data gradually are accumulating to support the role for cerebral oximetry monitoring during cardiac surgery, the results of the present survey support the view that its role remains poorly defined, and consensus for its appropriate use is lacking. Importantly, the authors observed marked variation in the use, perceived utility, and management of patients for 4 of the 6 CPB scenarios between perfusionists and anesthesiologists who share the management of CPB. These findings support the need for well-designed, adequately-powered clinical trials examining the value of this technology.
Related Topics
Health Sciences
Medicine and Dentistry
Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
Authors
David G. MA, MPH, Kevin CCP, LP, Cynthia L. CCP, Paul MD, Robert J. MD, Simon C. MBChB, MPH, Nicholas T. PhD,