Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
5959131 | Heart Rhythm | 2016 | 21 Pages |
Abstract
Under base case assumptions of relative cost of PVI to flutter ablation 1.5 and relative risk 4, a sequential ablation approach has less total expected cost and less expected risk. There appears to be no compelling reason to adopt a combined ablation approach into standard practice. Nomograms are presented to allow the reader to assess which strategy is preferred according to local relative costs and risk.
Related Topics
Health Sciences
Medicine and Dentistry
Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
Authors
Lorne J. MD, FRCPC, FHRS, Allan C. MD, FRCPC, FHRS, George J. MD, FRCPC, FHRS, Krista B. PhD, Damian P. MD, FRCPC, Jaimie MD, FRCPC, Jason D. MD, Raymond MD, FRCPC, FHRS, Anthony S.L. MD, FRCPC, FHRS, Peter MD, FRCPC, FHRS,