Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
5960593 | Heart Rhythm | 2018 | 9 Pages |
Abstract
EKG-defined scar, while ubiquitous for an infarct, has low sensitivity than CMR-LGE-defined scar. Unexpectedly, a significant number of pathological Q waves had absent infarct etiology, indicating high false positivity. Similarly, underrecognition of bona fide myocardial infarction frequently occurs, while 3-dimensional CMR volume of myocardial scar is far more predictive of a Q wave than of scar transmurality. This suggests that the well-regarded EKG may be a disservice when applied on a population basis, leading to inappropriate over or under downstream testing with wide socioeconomic implications.
Keywords
Related Topics
Health Sciences
Medicine and Dentistry
Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
Authors
Wadih MD, Mark PhD, Ronald B. RT, Geetha MS, Saundra B. BSN, Diane V. MS, June A. RT, Robert W.W. MD, FACC, FAHA,