Article ID Journal Published Year Pages File Type
5965419 International Journal of Cardiology 2016 7 Pages PDF
Abstract

BackgroundThe aim of this study was to investigate whether Fluoroscopy Assisted Scoring of Myocardial Hypoperfusion (FLASH) enabled a more accurate assessment of coronary blood flow and prediction of cardiac mortality after primary PCI (pPCI), than the presently used angiographic scores of reperfusion.MethodsWe included 453 STEMI patients who received pPCI at our hospital. Using the novel FLASH algorithm, based on contrast passage time and quantitative coronary analysis, FLASH flow was measured after pPCI and was used to calculate FLASH ratio of culprit and reference artery. In 28 of the 453 patients, FLASH flow was compared to Doppler-derived-flow.ResultsFLASH flow had a good correlation with Doppler derived flow (Pearson's R = 0.65, p < 0.001) and had a high inter-observer agreement (ICC = 0.83). FLASH flow was significantly lower in patients that died of cardiac death within six months (25.9 ± 17.7 ml/min vs. 38.2 ± 18.8 ml/min, p = 0.004). FLASH ratio had a high accuracy of predicting cardiac mortality with a significant higher area under the curve as compared with CTFC and QuBe (p = 0.041 and p = 0.008). FLASH ratio was an independent predictor of mortality at 6 months (HR = 0.98 per 1% increase, p = 0.014).ConclusionFLASH is a simple non-invasive method to estimate coronary blood flow and predict mortality directly following pPCI in STEMI patients, with a higher accuracy compared to the presently used angiographic scores.

Related Topics
Health Sciences Medicine and Dentistry Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
Authors
, , , , , , , , ,