Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
5976437 | International Journal of Cardiology | 2013 | 7 Pages |
BackgroundRosuvastatin and pravastatin have differential hydrophilicity and potency to inhibit hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA reductase that may be relevant to changes in adiponectin levels, insulin resistance, and the rate of new onset diabetes in large clinical studies. Therefore, we hypothesized that rosuvastatin and pravastatin may have differential metabolic effects in hypercholesterolemic patients.MethodsThis was a randomized, single-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel study. Age, gender, and body mass index were matched. Fifty-four patients were given placebo, rosuvastatin 10Â mg, or pravastatin 40Â mg, respectively once daily for 2Â months.ResultsWhen compared with pravastatin therapy, rosuvastatin therapy significantly reduced total, LDL cholesterol, and apolipoprotein B levels (PÂ <Â 0.05 by post-hoc comparison), but comparably improved flow-mediated dilation after 2Â months. Interestingly, rosuvastatin therapy significantly increased fasting insulin (mean % changes; 28%, PÂ =Â 0.005). and HbA1c (1%, PÂ =Â 0.038) while decreasing plasma adiponectin levels (9%, PÂ =Â 0.010) and insulin sensitivity (assessed by QUICKI; 2%, PÂ =Â 0.007) when compared with baseline. By contrast, pravastatin therapy significantly decreased fasting insulin (8%, PÂ =Â 0.042), and HbA1c levels (1%, PÂ =Â 0.019) while increasing plasma adiponectin levels (36%, PÂ =Â 0.006) and insulin sensitivity (3%, PÂ =Â 0.005) when compared with baseline. Moreover, these differential effects were evident when outcomes of rosuvastatin and pravastatin therapy were directly compared (PÂ =Â 0.002 for insulin levels by ANOVA on Ranks, PÂ =Â 0.003 for adiponectin, PÂ =Â 0.003 for QUICKI, and PÂ =Â 0.010 for HbA1c by ANOVA).ConclusionsWhile significantly reducing lipoprotein profiles, rosuvastatin therapy had unwanted metabolic effects in hypercholesterolemic patients when compared with pravastatin therapy, that may be clinically relevant in patients prone to metabolic diseases.