| Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type | 
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5988765 | The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery | 2015 | 10 Pages | 
Abstract
												Among contemporary cases, both traditional and hybrid total aortic arch replacement had acceptable results. Comparing these 2 different surgical treatment options is challenging, and an individualized approach offers the best results. Permanent adverse outcome was not significantly different between the 2 groups. Procedure type is not an independent predictor of permanent stroke. Prior cardiac disease, past or current smoking, and congestive heart failure predict adverse outcomes for total aortic arch replacement.
											Keywords
												26.1.3PODCPB26.1ACPLCCAFETChFTIA26.1.1Aortacardiopulmonary bypassTAARcoronary artery bypass graftinghybrid aortic arch repairfrozen elephant trunkcomputed tomographyCABGtransient ischemic attackelephant trunkpostoperative dayleft common carotid arteryconfidence intervalmean arterial pressureCSFCerebrospinal fluidcongestive heart failuremapantegrade cerebral perfusion
												Related Topics
												
													Health Sciences
													Medicine and Dentistry
													Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
												
											Authors
												Ourania MD, Andrea MD, Denton A. MD, Ricky J.L. MD, PhD, Kiki MS, Faisal G. MD, Lorraine D. MD, Shuab MD, Kim I. MD, Matt D. MS, Todd K. MD, Scott A. MD, Joseph S. MD, 
											