Efficacy of right axillary artery perfusion for antegrade cerebral perfusion in open total arch repair

ObjectiveRight axillary artery (RAxA) perfusion was introduced for selective antegrade cerebral perfusion in total aortic arch repair to prevent cerebral embolism derived from arterial cannulation. However, the strategic benefits and long-term results regarding the cannulation site remain controversial. We retrospectively compared the outcomes between propensity score-matched patients with and without using RAxA cannulation.MethodsBetween 2006 and 2012, 260 consecutive patients underwent total arch repair with antegrade cerebral perfusion and moderate hypothermia at a single institution. RAxA cannulation was added in 142 patients (54.6%), and 70 propensity score-matched pairs were obtained.ResultsThere were no significant differences in 30-day (2.9% [2 of 70] vs 5.7% [4 of 70]; P = .415 and in-hospital death (5.7% [4 of 70] vs 5.7% [4 of 70]; P = 1.000) between matched pairs. Although there was no significant difference in the occurrence of postoperative stroke (8.6% [6 of 70] vs 8.6% [6 of 70]; P = 1.000), the new rate of new occurrence of postoperative paraparesis was lower in patients with RAxA perfusion (0% [0 of 70] vs 4.3% [3 of 70]; P = .067). With a mean follow-up period of 1057 ± 686 days, the overall 5-year survival was 90.6% and was 89.6% for patients with RAxA perfusion. Thee difference in survival between patients with and without RAxA perfusion was not significant.ConclusionsRAxA perfusion is a useful option for total aortic arch repair, and the midterm outcomes were satisfactory. However, RAxA perfusion did not completely prevent stroke in patients with an atherothrombotic aorta.