Upper-normal waist circumference is a risk marker for metabolic syndrome in normal-weight subjects

•We examined the association between WC and MetS among normal weight subjects.•The prevalence of MetS gradually increased with increasing WC.•Prediabetes and borderline dyslipidemia are also prevalent in subjects with upper-normal WC.•Upper-normal WC represents a risk for acquiring a greater number of MetS components.

Background and aimsTo elucidate implication of upper-normal waist circumference (WC), we examined whether the normal range of WC still represents a risk of metabolic syndrome (MetS) or non-adipose MetS components among normal-weight subjects.Methods and resultsA total of 173,510 persons (100,386 men and 73,124 women) with normal WC (<90/80 cm in men/women) and body mass index (BMI) of 18.5-24.9 were included. Subjects were categorized as having low, moderate, and upper-normal WC for those with WC < 80, 80-84, and 85-89 cm in men and <70, 70-74, and 75-79 cm in women, respectively. The prevalence of all the non-adipose MetS components (e.g. prediabetes and borderline dyslipidemia) was significantly higher in subjects with upper-normal WC on comparison with those with low WC. Overall, the prevalence of MetS (having three or more of four non-adipose MetS components) gradually increased with increasing WC (12%, 21%, and 27% in men and 11%, 14%, and 19% in women for low, moderate, and upper-normal WC, respectively). Moreover, the risk of having a greater number of MetS components increased in subjects with upper-normal WC compared with those with low WC (odds ratios for the number of one, two, three, and four MetS components: 1.29, 1.81, 2.53, and 2.47 in men and 1.16, 1.55, 1.49, and 2.20 in women, respectively).ConclusionUpper-normal WC represents a risk for acquiring a greater number of MetS components and the early stage of MetS components (prediabetes and borderline dyslipidemia), after adjusting for BMI, in a large general population with normal WC and BMI.