Article ID Journal Published Year Pages File Type
6002794 Thrombosis Research 2011 4 Pages PDF
Abstract

IntroductionThe target of this study was to compare thromboelastography coagulation parameters in pregnant and non-pregnant women. If appropriate, we would propose recommendations for new reference ranges for pregnant women in their third trimester.Materials and methodsProspective observational study, comparing, by using thromboelastography, the blood samples of 60 healthy women in third trimester of pregnancy (group GRAV) to the samples of the control group of 43 healthy non-pregnant fertile women (group NON-GRAV). Selective percentiles were used to determine new reference limits.ResultsMean values and standard deviations (SD) in both groups were as follows (GRAV vs NON-GRAV): time r 4.7 min (SD 1.7) vs. 7.8 (SD 2.8); time k 1.5 min (SD 0.5) vs. 2,7 (SD 0,9); alpha angle 69.6° (SD 5.5) vs. 54.4 (SD 11.5); maximum amplitude 71.3 mm (SD 4.5) vs. 63.1 (SD 5.4); coagulation index 2.7 (SD 1.8) vs. -1.9 (SD 3.0); LY60 1.1% (SD 1.8) vs. 4.8 (SD 3.6). Due to statistically significant differences between both groups, we established, based on our results, these new thromboelastography reference limits for pregnant women: time r 2-8 min (“common” range 4-8 min), time k 1-3 min (“common” range 1-4 min), alpha angle 60-77° (“common” range 47-74°), maximum amplitude 64-76 mm (“common” range 55-73 mm), LY60 0-3% (“common” range 0-15%), coagulation index 0-5 (“common” range (− 3) - (+ 3)).ConclusionsIt may not be suitable to use the same reference ranges for pregnant women as for the general population. Therefore, we suggest new reference limits for thromboelastography in pregnant women.

Related Topics
Health Sciences Medicine and Dentistry Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
Authors
, , , , , ,