Article ID Journal Published Year Pages File Type
6014707 Epilepsy & Behavior 2011 9 Pages PDF
Abstract

Using conversation analysis (CA), we studied conversations between one United Kingdom-based epilepsy specialist and 13 patients with seizures in whom there was uncertainty about the diagnosis and for whom different treatment and investigational options were being considered. In line with recent communication guidance, the specialist offered some form of choice to all patients: in eight cases, a course of action was proposed, to be accepted or rejected, and in the remaining five, a “menu” of options was offered. Even when presenting a menu, the specialist sometimes conveyed his own preferences in how he described the options, and in some cases the menu was used for reasons other than offering choice (e.g., to address patient resistance). Close linguistic and interactional analysis of clinical encounters can show why doctors may feel they are offering choices when patients report that the decision was clinician dominated.

Research Highlights► Neurologists may offer patients choice by proposing a course of action for acceptance/rejection. ► Alternatively, they may offer patients a “menu” of options from which to choose. ► Although the latter appears more open, a preference may be conveyed in how the options are described. ► Neurologists may use a menu for reasons other than offering choice (e.g., addressing resistance).

Related Topics
Life Sciences Neuroscience Behavioral Neuroscience
Authors
, , , ,