Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
6015893 | Epilepsy Research | 2013 | 6 Pages |
Abstract
Diazepam rectal gel (Diastat®) is the only FDA-approved product indicated for acute repetitive seizures. Despite its proven efficacy, most older children and adults object to this route of administration. As a result, many patients do not realize the benefit of a therapy that can improve outcomes and decrease healthcare costs. Intranasal administration of benzodiazepines offers a potential alternative. The primary objective of this study was to compare the bioavailability and pharmacokinetics of two novel intranasal (IN) diazepam (DZP) formulations versus intravenous (IV) administration in healthy volunteers. Twenty-four healthy volunteers were randomized into an open-label, three-way crossover study. 10Â mg doses of two investigational intranasal DZP formulations (solution, suspension) and a 5Â mg IV dose of commercially available DZP injectable, USP were given. A two-week washout period separated treatments. Plasma samples for DZP analysis were collected pre-dose and at regular intervals up to 240Â h post-dose. DZP concentration-time data were analyzed using a non-compartmental pharmacokinetics approach. Exposure following administration of DZP IN solution (absolute bioavailability - 97%) was greater than the IN suspension (absolute bioavailability - 67%). Mean Cmaxvalues for the suspension and solution formulations were 221Â ng/mL and 272Â ng/mL, respectively. Median time to maximum concentration (Tmax) was 1Â h and 1.5Â h for suspension and solution formulation, respectively. Both investigational intranasal formulations were well tolerated. The results of this pilot study indicate that development of an intranasal diazepam formulation with high bioavailability, reasonable variability, and good tolerability is feasible.
Related Topics
Life Sciences
Neuroscience
Neurology
Authors
Suresh K. Agarwal, Robert L. Kriel, Richard C. Brundage, Vijay D. Ivaturi, James C. Cloyd,