Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
6029101 | NeuroImage | 2013 | 8 Pages |
Abstract
The results showed that the MN estimator is robust against errors in skull conductivity: the conductivity had a moderate effect on amplitudes of lead fields and spatial filter vectors, but the effect on corresponding morphologies was small. The localization performance of the EEG or combined MEGÂ +Â EEG MN estimator was only minimally affected by the conductivity error, while the spread of the estimate varied slightly. Thus, the uncertainty with respect to skull conductivity should not prevent researchers from applying minimum norm estimation to EEG or combined MEGÂ +Â EEG data. Comparing our results to those obtained earlier with dipole models shows that general judgment on the performance of an imaging modality should not be based on analysis with one source estimation method only.
Related Topics
Life Sciences
Neuroscience
Cognitive Neuroscience
Authors
Matti Stenroos, Olaf Hauk,