| Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6036019 | NeuroImage | 2011 | 10 Pages |
Abstract
⺠Eye movements in the encoding stage of a change detection task do not distinguish between correct change detection and detection failure. ⺠Eye fixation-related potentials (EFRP) in fixation locations around relevant regions predict change detection success or failure. ⺠EFRP corresponding to saccade size lead to correct detection, no correspondence leads to incorrect detection. ⺠EFRP reflect encoding at locations of the next fixation target. ⺠Encoding failures in change detection result from deviation between eye movement and attention.
Related Topics
Life Sciences
Neuroscience
Cognitive Neuroscience
Authors
Andrey R. Nikolaev, Chie Nakatani, Gijs Plomp, Peter Jurica, Cees van Leeuwen,