Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
6036817 | NeuroImage | 2009 | 5 Pages |
Abstract
Automated morphological segmentation combined with an adaptive boosting statistical classifier showed substantial agreement with manual segmentation, with an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of 0.90 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.80-0.95) for WMH volume and median similarity index (SI) of 0.58 (interquartile range [IQR] 0.50-0.65). The method also showed similarly high levels of agreement with semi-automated segmentation, with ICC 0.92 (95% CI 0.89-0.93) and median SI 0.56 (IQR 0.49-0.66). Its best performance was observed for the highest tertile of WMH volume. Threshold-based and Gaussian mixture model-driven automated segmentation generally did not perform well in this study.
Related Topics
Life Sciences
Neuroscience
Cognitive Neuroscience
Authors
Richard Beare, Velandai Srikanth, Jian Chen, Thanh G. Phan, Jennifer Stapleton, Rebecca Lipshut, David Reutens,