| Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6053146 | Journal of Dentistry | 2015 | 7 Pages |
ObjectiveTo investigate the influence of the combination of patient-specific abutments and titanium adhesive bases on the long-term in vitro performance of anterior crowns.MethodsTen systems of screw-retained implant and adhesive base combinations (n = 8/group) were restored with zirconia or polyetherketone (PEEK) abutments and identical full-anatomical zirconia crowns. For simulating clinical anterior loading, implants were fixed at an angle of 135° and submitted to prolonged thermal cycling and mechanical loading (TC: 6 Ã 3000 cycles, 5 °C/55 °C; ML: 100 N, 3.6 Ã 106 cycles) to cause and register fatigue failure. Failed restorations were examined by means of scanning electron microscopy. Surviving restorations were loaded to fracture. Data (mean ± standard deviation) were statistically analyzed (ANOVA; Bonferroni; Kaplan-Meier-Log-Rank; α = 0.05).ResultsSeven systems survived TCML without any failure. The other three systems showed loosening and fracturing of the screw (0.4-1.6 Ã 106 loadings) or debonding between base and abutment (0.002-3.4 Ã 106 loadings). None of the systems showed any fracture of the crown or failed bonding between abutment and crown. The Log-Rank test showed significant (p = 0.000) differences. Fracture data significantly varied (ANOVA p = 0.000) between the individual systems (minimum: 371 N; maximum: 763 N). Failures were mostly caused by bending or fracturing of the screw and in three cases by fracture of the abutment.ConclusionsAnterior implant-supported zirconia crowns on titanium adhesive bases and bonded patient-specific zirconia abutments provided good in vitro performance and high fracture resistance. Sufficient high torque moments and early re-screwing may be advised.Clinical relevanceMost adhesive base and abutment combinations may be appropriate for anterior application. Individual improvements may contribute to enduring success.
