Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
6054338 | Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery | 2016 | 9 Pages |
Abstract
The purpose of the present report is to contrast and compare 2 methods of dental implant placement. One method uses computed tomography data for computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing to generate static guides for implant placement. The second method is a dynamic navigation system that uses a stereo vision computer triangulation setup to guide implant placement. A review of the published data was performed to provide evidence-based material to compare each method. Finally, the indications for each type of method are discussed.
Related Topics
Health Sciences
Medicine and Dentistry
Dentistry, Oral Surgery and Medicine
Authors
Michael S. DMD, Robert W. DDS,