| Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6057233 | Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology and Oral Radiology | 2012 | 8 Pages |
ObjectiveThe objective of this study was to investigate the cementum status in natural teeth opposing implant-supported bridgework.MethodsMaxillary premolars and molars opposing immediate-loading (IL) and delayed-loading (DL) mandibular implant-supported bridgework in 4 Macaca fascicularis were harvested after 3 months of functional loading. Another 2 monkeys without mandibular fixed prostheses served as control. The cervical (CCW) and apical cementum width (ACW), and resorption craters (RCs) were measured.ResultsNo significant differences were observed between test and control groups for mean CCW (control = 26.79 ± 3.28, IL = 21.29 ± 9.12, and DL = 20.32 ± 5.65 μm) and for ACW (control = 937.97 ± 353.74, IL = 955.26 ± 720.05, and DL = 750.56 ± 517.26 μm) (P > .05). In test and control monkeys, RCs were uncommon and showed no significant differences in width (control = 0.71 ± 0.38, IL = 1.02 ± 0.49, DL = 0.85 ± 1.02 mm) and depth (control = 0.15 ± 0.07, IL = 0.25 ± 0.40, DL = 0.22 ± 0.15 mm) (P > .05).ConclusionsPresent findings suggest that implant-supported bridgework does not produce any adverse effects on the cementum of opposing natural teeth after 3 months of functional loading.
