Article ID Journal Published Year Pages File Type
6098353 Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 2011 7 Pages PDF
Abstract

BackgroundWe previously showed a significant variability in adenoma detection among colonoscopists who were participating in a mass screening program. The reasons for such variability remain largely unknown.ObjectiveTo study intercenter variations in neoplasia detection.Design and SettingSecondary analyses of colonoscopy findings from the 2 first rounds of a French screening program: logistic regressions and repeated-measures analyses of variance.MaterialA total of 3487 colonoscopies performed by all 19 endoscopists who performed 30 examinations or more per round at 8 centers (6 private, 2 public).Main Outcome MeasurementsProbabilities of detecting 1, 2, or 3 or more adenomas, 1 adenoma 10 mm or larger, or colorectal cancer, as well as the corresponding adjusted (for patient age and sex) per-center detection rates.ResultsEndoscopy centers were not significant predictors of the probability of detecting any category of neoplasia with the exception of the 2 adenomas or more category (P < .005). The ranges of the adjusted detection rates for each of these categories were 33.1% to 43.1%, 11.1% to 21.6%, 3.6% to 8.1%, 16.3% to 23.6%, and 8.3% to 12.6%, respectively. When the colonoscopies that were performed by the 11 endoscopists who performed 30 examinations or more per center in 2 or more centers were separately analyzed, no intercenter statistically significant variability was observed with the exception of 1 endoscopist and the 1 adenoma category. In a subgroup of 1100 colonoscopies performed by 6 endoscopists who were working at the same 3 centers, intercenter variability was not statistically significant.LimitationsType II error because of sample sizes.ConclusionsIn our setting, intercenter variability did not explain interendoscopist variability for neoplasia detection rate.

Related Topics
Health Sciences Medicine and Dentistry Gastroenterology
Authors
, , , , , , ,