Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
6133550 | Journal of Virological Methods | 2014 | 6 Pages |
Abstract
The aim of this study was to develop an optimal technique for detecting hepatitis E virus (HEV) in swine livers. Here, three elution buffers and two concentration methods were compared with respect to enhancing recovery of HEV from swine liver samples. Real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and nested RT-PCR were performed to detect HEV RNA. When phosphate-buffered saline (PBS, pH 7.4) was used to concentrate HEV in swine liver samples using ultrafiltration, real-time RT-PCR detected HEV in 6 of the 26 samples. When threonine buffer was used to concentrate HEV using polyethylene glycol (PEG) precipitation and ultrafiltration, real-time RT-PCR detected HEV in 1 and 3 of the 26 samples, respectively. When glycine buffer was used to concentrate HEV using ultrafiltration and PEG precipitation, real-time RT-PCR detected HEV in 1 and 3 samples of the 26 samples, respectively. When nested RT-PCR was used to detect HEV, all samples tested negative regardless of the type of elution buffer or concentration method used. Therefore, the combination of real-time RT-PCR and ultrafiltration with PBS buffer was the most sensitive and reliable method for detecting HEV in swine livers.
Related Topics
Life Sciences
Immunology and Microbiology
Virology
Authors
Na Ry Son, Dong Joo Seo, Min Hwa Lee, Sheungwoo Seo, Xiaoyu Wang, Bog-Hieu Lee, Jeong-Su Lee, In-Sun Joo, In-Gyun Hwang, Changsun Choi,