Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
6150575 | Contemporary Clinical Trials | 2015 | 9 Pages |
Abstract
In the past 25Â years, the 3Â +Â 3 design has been the most popular approach for planning phase I dose-finding trials in oncology. During the same time period, major development of more efficient model-based designs has been made by statistical researchers aiming to improve the clinical practice of dose finding in oncology. Despite the effort, 3Â +Â 3 is still the most frequently used designs in practice. Part of the reason is due to the lack of software tools that allow comparison of different designs, including 3Â +Â 3 and other model-based methods, in a head-to-head and easy-to-use fashion. To this end, we introduce NextGen-DF, a next-generation tool for designing oncology dose-finding trials that allows for construction, comparison, and calibration of multiple designs via internet, in real time, and independent of computer operating systems. Through NextGen-DF, we present massive and user-generated comparison results based on over 4 million simulated trials, which clearly indicate the inferiority of 3Â +Â 3. To our knowledge, the reported crowd-sourcing results are the largest and most objective comparison across major dose-finding methods to date. NextGen-DF is expected to improve patient care and drug development by providing safer and more efficient designs for phase I oncology trials. NextGen-DF is available at www.compgenome.org/NGDF.
Keywords
Related Topics
Health Sciences
Medicine and Dentistry
Medicine and Dentistry (General)
Authors
Shengjie Yang, Sue-Jane Wang, Yuan Ji,