Laparoendoscopic Single-site Nephrectomy and Heminephroureterectomy in Children Using Standard Laparoscopic Setup Versus Conventional Laparoscopy

ObjectiveTo investigate the safety and effectiveness of laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) using standard laparoscopic setup in pediatric nephrectomy/heminephroureterectomy (HN) by comparing with conventional laparoscopy (CL).MethodsTwelve consecutive children who underwent LESS (nephrectomy = 8, HN = 4) from 2009 to 2012 were compared with a matched cohort of 18 children who underwent CL (nephrectomy = 12, HN = 6) at the same institution. Data were reviewed retrospectively.ResultsThere was no difference between the 2 groups in the age of patients, body weight, gender distribution, laterality of pathology, postoperative analgesic requirement, and hospital stay. Eleven of the 12 children in the LESS group underwent the procedure successfully without additional trocar placement. The only open conversion happened in the case of LESS of the lower moiety HN. LESS nephrectomy took longer operative time than CL (mean 156 +/- 45 vs 99 +/- 35 minutes, median 155 vs 90 minutes, P <.01). Wound infection occurred in 1 patient after CL nephrectomy. No postoperative complication or access site hernia was noted in the children in the LESS group at follow-up.ConclusionLESS nephrectomy and HN in the pediatric population is safe and effective with a minimally invasive nature comparable to CL. Learning curve factors may contribute to the reported longer operative time in LESS. Further studies are required to investigate the implication of patient selection and the cosmetic benefits of LESS, which may potentially require longer operative time.