Article ID Journal Published Year Pages File Type
6182700 Gynecologic Oncology 2014 8 Pages PDF
Abstract

•LBC with HR-HPV triage for ASC-US have the best balance between sensitivity and specificity among cervical cancer screening strategies.•The high NPV for women with negative LBC and HR-HPV permit a safe extension of longer screening intervals.

ObjectiveThe objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of introducing HR-HPV testing in cytology regarding cervical cancer screening practice.MethodsA pooled analysis of liquid-based cytology (LBC) and HR-HPV testing using data from 13 population-based cervical cancer screening studies conducted in China was performed. Participants (n = 25,404) received LBC and HR-HPV testing. Women found to be positive on screening were referred for colposcopy and biopsy. The effectiveness of screening strategies that use: LBC with HR-HPV triage for atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASC-US), HR-HPV testing with cytology triage for HPV positive tests, or LBC and HPV cotesting was compared with that of LBC screening alone.ResultsLBC with HR-HPV triage for ASC-US had similar sensitivity compared with LBC alone, but significantly increased specificity for both cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or worse (CIN2 +) and CIN3 or worse (CIN3 +) endpoints, and had the best balance between sensitivity and specificity among the strategies. LBC and HR-HPV cotesting had the highest sensitivity and negative predictive value (NPV) and could permit a safe extension of screening intervals. Through the use of an immediate colposcopy threshold of ASC-US or worse for HR-HPV positive women and the use of a raised threshold of low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL) or worse for HR-HPV negative women, LBC and HR-HPV cotesting could provide the same effectiveness as LBC testing with HR-HPV triage for ASC-US at baseline tests.ConclusionsThe results of the current study support the use of the cervical cancer screening guidelines in China.

Related Topics
Health Sciences Medicine and Dentistry Obstetrics, Gynecology and Women's Health
Authors
, , , , , , , , , ,