| Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6182902 | Gynecologic Oncology | 2012 | 6 Pages |
ObjectiveIn the US, second non-ocular malignancies are the primary cause of death in retinoblastoma survivors with the germline RB1 mutation. Soft tissue sarcomas are one of the most likely malignancies to pose a risk to these patients, with leiomyosarcoma (LMS) being the most common subtype. As our cohort is followed for a longer period, we discover new second malignancy risks for these patients.MethodsWe estimated the risk for uterine leiomyosarcoma (ULMS) in a cohort of 1854 patients with retinoblastoma who were diagnosed at two US institutions from 1914 through 1996. The standardized incidence ratio and excess absolute risk were calculated by comparison with population data from the Connecticut Tumor Registry or from National Cancer Institute Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. The cumulative risk at 50Â years of age was also calculated.ResultsSeven of 525 female hereditary retinoblastoma patients developed ULMS. Five of these patients were used in the risk analysis, resulting in an excess risk of 3.87 per 10,000 women. Among hereditary patients who developed ULMS the excess risk increases dramatically with age: to 20/10,000 for female hereditary retinoblastoma patients aged between 30 and 39Â years, and to 27/10,000 for patients aged 40Â + years.ConclusionThere is a substantial excess risk of ULMS in female hereditary retinoblastoma patients. As more patients survive into their thirties, this number is likely to increase. These findings raise the question of early childbearing, screening and prophylactic measures in hereditary retinoblastoma patients: all issues that would benefit from confirmation from other retinoblastoma cohorts, to allow for better guided counsel of these patients.
⺠There is a substantial excess risk of ULMS in hereditary retinoblastoma patients. ⺠Among hereditary patients, the excess risk increases dramatically with age. ⺠These findings raise questions of how to best counsel these retinoblastoma patients.
