Should bone scintigraphy be used as a routine adjunct to skeletal survey in the imaging of non-accidental injury? A 10 year review of reports in a single centre

•Retrospective evaluation of bone scintigraphy (BS) in the diagnosis of NAI.•Compares fracture detection using bone scintigraphy and skeletal survey (SS).•BS can aid confidence of diagnosis or identify new findings in 12% of cases.•BS provides a time effective alternative to follow up SS at 10-14 days.

AimTo retrospectively analyse the bone scintigraphy (BS) and skeletal survey (SS) data to evaluate the role and limitations of BS in the diagnosis of non-accidental injury (NAI).Materials and methodsAll SS and BS performed over a 10 year period, for possible NAI, in children under 2 years old were retrospectively reviewed. Reports were compared in cases where both studies were performed and findings classified into one of three groups: (1) congruent: both reports agreed; (2) BS added confidence to the SS findings; (3) BS demonstrated a new finding. False-positive and false-negative rates for BS were calculated.ResultsOne hundred and sixty-six patients had both SS and BS. The findings were congruent in 74% of cases. BS added confidence to the SS findings in 8% and revealed a new abnormality in 4% of patients. BS demonstrated false-positive and -negative rates of 2% and 13%, respectively. Occult bony injury was detected in 12% of the 237 patients imaged.DiscussionWhen used as an adjunct to SS in the investigation of NAI, BS can aid the confidence of diagnosis or identify new findings in 12% of cases. In centres where nuclear medicine is readily available and there is appropriate expertise in paediatric BS, this modality provides a time-effective alternative to follow-up SS at 10-14 days.