| Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6199644 | Ophthalmology | 2015 | 6 Pages |
Abstract
Smartphone and nonmydriatic fundus photography are each able to detect DR and sight-threatening disease. However, the nonmydriatic camera is more sensitive at detecting DR than the smartphone. At this time, the benefits of the smartphone (connectivity, portability, and reduced cost) are not offset by the lack of sufficient sensitivity for detection of DR in most clinical circumstances.
Keywords
Related Topics
Health Sciences
Medicine and Dentistry
Ophthalmology
Authors
Martha E. BS, Ramachandran DO, PhD, Vijayaraghavan MBBS, FRCS, Ranjit Mohan MD, Harish PhD, K.M. Venkat MD, Timothy W. MD, Viswanathan MD, PhD, Laura A. MSPH, Michael J. MS, Andrew M. MD,