Article ID Journal Published Year Pages File Type
6204060 Annals of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine 2015 6 Pages PDF
Abstract

BackgroundThe concept of an ideal sitting posture is often used in practice but lacks a basis in evidence.ObjectiveWe designed a cross-sectional, comparative, matched study to determine the effects of chair and posture on lumbar curvature in 10 patients with chronic non-specific low back pain (CLBP; mean pain duration 24 ± 18 months) and 10 healthy matched controls.MethodsPelvic incidence, sacral slope and lumbar curvature were measured on computed radiographs by 2 blinded clinicians for subjects in 2 postures (upright vs slumped sitting) and on 2 chairs (usual flat chair vs kneeling chair).ResultsThe reliability of measures was excellent (intraclass correlation coefficient > 0.9). As hypothesized, the expected sacral slope and lumbar lordosis changed between standing and sitting on a kneeling chair as compared with a usual chair (P < 0.0001) and less in patients than controls (P = 0.046) for lordosis only. In addition, as expected, changes were more pronounced with slumped than upright sitting (P < 0.0001). An interaction between chairs and postures for lumbar lordosis (P = 0.02) indicated more pronounced effects of the chair in slumped sitting. Therefore, lumbar lordosis was reduced less when sitting on a kneeling chair as compared with a usual chair.ConclusionsAlthough healthy subjects showed more reduction in lordosis between standing and sitting, the chair effect was found in both CLBP patients and healthy subjects.

Related Topics
Health Sciences Medicine and Dentistry Orthopedics, Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation
Authors
, , , , , , , ,