Article ID Journal Published Year Pages File Type
6206710 Gait & Posture 2013 5 Pages PDF
Abstract

BackgroundQuantification of sitting and standing is possible with the ActivPAL accelerometer, using algorithms to classify activity into time spent sitting, standing and stepping. The purpose of this study was to determine children's week-to-week differences in time spent sitting/lying and standing along with other measures as provided by the ActivPAL accelerometer during continuous wearing of the ActivPAL monitor.MethodsFifty-six children (age 10.2 ± 0.9 years, mean ± SD) were recruited from 30 urban schools in Auckland, New Zealand. Children wore the monitor for 24 h per day up to 14 days. Analyses were performed with mixed modeling. Reliability was expressed as change in the mean from week to week, intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and standard error of measurement (SEM).ResultsMean week-to-week differences in percent time spent sitting/lying, standing and stepping on week days and weekend days for girls and boys were typically small. Step and sit-to-stand counts differences were small and unclear respectively. ICC values ranged from 0.40 to 0.79 during week days and 0.25-0.60 during weekends. SEM for time spent sitting/lying, standing and stepping were ∼3.5%, ∼2.5% and ∼1.5% respectively.ConclusionThe ActivPAL showed moderate to low week-to-week reliability for habitual activity and postural allocation under free living conditions in boys and girls. Interventions aimed at a moderate reduction in sitting time (∼5% of the day) will require modest sample sizes for adequate precision.

► First study to report week-to-week differences in postural allocation and walking in children. ► There were small changes in means observed between weeks of recording. ► Girls tended to be similar in their behavior compared to boys during week days. ► Reducing sitting time by a certain amount should aim for values greater than the reported SEM.

Related Topics
Health Sciences Medicine and Dentistry Orthopedics, Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation
Authors
, , , ,