| Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6206803 | Gait & Posture | 2013 | 5 Pages |
â¢IP based estimations of mean step length were compared in older persons.â¢High test-retest reliability for all estimators for straight steady-state walking.â¢IP based estimations had good to high agreement with reference step length.â¢There is no clear advantage of a simple or 2-phase IP model of walking.â¢Better estimation of mean step length with individual adjustment of the IP models.
Inverted pendulum (IP) models of human walking allow for wearable motion-sensor based estimations of spatio-temporal gait parameters during unconstrained walking in daily-life conditions. At present it is unclear to what extent different IP based estimations yield different results, and reliability and validity have not been investigated in older persons without a specific medical condition. The aim of this study was to compare reliability and validity of four different IP based estimations of mean step length in independent-living older persons. Participants were assessed twice and walked at different speeds while wearing a tri-axial accelerometer at the lower back. For all step-length estimators, test-retest intra-class correlations approached or were above 0.90. Intra-class correlations with reference step length were above 0.92 with a mean error of 0.0Â cm when (1) multiplying the estimated center-of-mass displacement during a step by an individual correction factor in a simple IP model, or (2) adding an individual constant for bipedal stance displacement to the estimated displacement during single stance in a 2-phase IP model. When applying generic corrections or constants in all subjects (i.e. multiplication by 1.25, or adding 75% of foot length), correlations were above 0.75 with a mean error of respectively 2.0 and 1.2Â cm. Although the results indicate that an individual adjustment of the IP models provides better estimations of mean step length, the ease of a generic adjustment can be favored when merely evaluating intra-individual differences. Further studies should determine the validity of these IP based estimations for assessing gait in daily life.
