Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
6208980 | The Journal of Arthroplasty | 2015 | 6 Pages |
Abstract
Interest in mechanical compression for venous thromboembolic disease prophylaxis has increased over the last several years because of concerns related to bleeding complications associated with chemoprophylaxis. However, the research evaluating compression is clearly not definitive. Therefore, this review aims to: (1) summarize methods of compression; (2) compare AAOS, ACCP, and SCIP guidelines; and (3) make recommendations regarding usage. Below-the-knee devices have demonstrated the most efficacy with multiple guidelines recommending usage. Efficacy and compliance may be improved with the use of mobile devices.
Keywords
Related Topics
Health Sciences
Medicine and Dentistry
Orthopedics, Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation
Authors
Todd P. M.D., Jeffrey J. D.O., Julio J. M.D., Randa K. M.D., Jay R. M.D., Michael A. M.D.,