Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
6242795 | Academic Radiology | 2013 | 10 Pages |
Abstract
Each modality has its strengths. Micro-CT permitted more rapid acquisition (<10 minutes) with the highest spatial resolution (88-micron isotropic resolution). But detection of metastatic lesions requires the use of a blood pool contrast agent, which could introduce a confound in the evaluation of new therapies. MRI was slower (30 minutes) and had lower anisotropic spatial resolution. But MRI eliminates the need for a contrast agent and the contrast-to-noise between tumor and normal parenchyma was higher, making earlier detection of small lesions possible. Both methods supported a relatively high-throughput, longitudinal study of the development of metastatic lesions.
Keywords
Related Topics
Health Sciences
Medicine and Dentistry
Radiology and Imaging
Authors
Prachi PhD, Samuel M. PhD, Yi MD, Jennifer DVM, Rendon MD, G. Allan PhD,