Article ID Journal Published Year Pages File Type
6263463 Brain Research 2014 9 Pages PDF
Abstract

•Variable injury sensitivity across sub-fields can be shown in hippocampal slices.•GluN1, or GluA2 subunit expression differences may not underlie the variability.•The differential vulnerability of sub-fields to ischemic stress is lost with age.

For more than a century, the hippocampal sub-fields have been recognized as being differentially vulnerable to injury. While the cause remains unknown, the explanations generally considered have involved either vascular differences, or innate variability among cells. To examine the latter possibility, we prepared acute hippocampal slices from Sprague-Dawley rats, applied a brief period of oxygen-glucose deprivation (OGD; an in vitro model of ischemia), and assessed the viability of dissected sub-fields (CA1, CA3, dentate gyrus) by measuring mitochondrial 2,3,5-triphenyltetrazolium chloride (TTC) metabolism. In slices from young animals (15 weeks of age), post-OGD TTC metabolism was significantly reduced in the CA sub-fields relative to the dentate gyrus. Since previous studies found increasing age may worsen ischemic injury, we completed the same experiment using tissue from animals at 52 weeks of age, and found no differences in TTC metabolism across sub-fields. Given the established role of glutamate receptors in ischemic cell death, we examined two key subunit proteins (GluN1, found in all NMDA receptors, and GluA2, found in most AMPA receptors) across sub-fields and age to determine whether their expression complemented our viability data. We found that, relative to the CA1, the DG displayed greater GluN1 expression and lower GluA2 expression in both young and old animals. Our results confirm that regional vulnerability can be shown in a slice model, that the property is not intransigent, and that these features are likely not attributable to the expression pattern of key glutamate receptor subunits, but another molecular variable that changes over the lifespan.

Related Topics
Life Sciences Neuroscience Neuroscience (General)
Authors
, ,