Article ID Journal Published Year Pages File Type
6267712 Journal of Neuroscience Methods 2016 11 Pages PDF
Abstract

•Automated quality assurance and thresholding for volumetric MEG maps were demonstrated.•This method produces a previously lacking QA metric that parallels goodness of fit used in dipole models.•Automated thresholding produces strong co-localization with dipole mapping in simple paradigms.•Our method is ideally suited for single-subject MEG mapping including when complex activation is expected.

BackgroundRobust and reproducible source mapping with magnetoencephalography is particularly challenging at the individual level. We evaluated a receiver-operating characteristic reliability (ROC-r) method for automated production of volumetric MEG maps in single-subjects. ROC-r provides quality assurance comparable to that offered by goodness-of-fit (GoF) and confidence volume (CV) for equivalent current dipole (ECD) modeling.New methodROC-r utilizes within-session reproducibility for quality assurance, latency identification, and thresholding of volumetric source maps. We tested ROC-r on simulated and real MEG with a strongly focal source, using somatosensory evoked fields (SEFs) elicited by bilateral median nerve stimulation (MNS). For quality assurance, the ROC-r reliable fraction (FR) was compared to the ECD GoF and CV. Peak beamformer locations and latencies identified by ROC-r were compared to the ECD for co-localization accuracy.ResultsThe predominant component of the SEF response occurred around 35 ms, contralateral to the MNS.Comparison with existing methodsFR and 1/CV were more strongly correlated (mean Pearson's correlation: 0.76; 95% CI 0.60-0.87) than FR and GoF (0.65; 95% CI 0.32-0.85). There was no difference in the latency of the peak GoF (35.0+/−0.6 ms), CV (34.8+/−0.7 ms) and FR (35.5+/−0.8 ms). The ECD fits and ROC-r peaks co-localized to within a mean (median) distance of 8.3+/−5.9 mm (6.2 mm).ConclusionROC-r volumetric mapping co-localized closely with the standard ECD approach. This analysis can be added to any whole-brain MEG source imaging protocol, and is especially useful for single-subject mapping. Additionally, the development of FR as an analogue to GoF or CV for volumetric mapping is a critical improvement for clinical applications.

Related Topics
Life Sciences Neuroscience Neuroscience (General)
Authors
, , , , , ,