Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
6335986 | Atmospheric Environment | 2016 | 7 Pages |
Abstract
In the feeding alleys, emissions of NH3 were higher from solid floors than from flushing systems and perforated floors. N2O emissions were significantly different among farms but the absolute values were relatively low. CH4 and CO2 emissions were higher from perforated floors than from other types of housing solution. Regarding the cubicles, the emissions of NH3 were approximately equal from the two housing solution studied. Contrariwise, N2O, CH4 and CO2 emissions were different between the cubicles with rubber mat and those with straw where the highest values were found.
Related Topics
Physical Sciences and Engineering
Earth and Planetary Sciences
Atmospheric Science
Authors
Cecilia Baldini, Federica Borgonovo, Davide Gardoni, Marcella Guarino,