| Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 635643 | Journal of Membrane Science | 2011 | 10 Pages |
Abstract
⺠PAN membrane had a lower fouling rate than PVDF membrane. ⺠PAN membrane rejected more SMP than PVDF membrane due to the pore sizes. ⺠PVDF membrane rejected more carbohydrates and fewer proteins than the PAN membrane. ⺠HPO and HPI-N had highest fouling potential for PAN and PVDF membrane, respectively.
Keywords
Related Topics
Physical Sciences and Engineering
Chemical Engineering
Filtration and Separation
Authors
Pan Wang, Zhiwei Wang, Zhichao Wu, Suihai Mai,