Article ID Journal Published Year Pages File Type
63640 Journal of CO2 Utilization 2015 9 Pages PDF
Abstract

•SBR, SMR and DMR processes were experimentally evaluated with a focus on reactant conversion and product distribution.•The Pd–Rh catalyst performed better than the commercial catalysts for SBR and other reforming processes.•Net CO2 reduction was achieved over Pd–Rh catalyst at temperatures above 1010 K.

Metal-foam-coated 0.09 wt% [Pd(7)–Rh(1)]/(CeZrO2–Al2O3) catalyst was compared with commercially available alumina-supported 8.0 wt% Ru and 13.0 wt% Ni catalysts for steam reforming of a model biogas. The experiments were conducted in a tubular reactor using a feedstock with the steam-to-methane ratio of 1.50 at 1 atm pressure and 20,000 h−1 GHSV. CH4 reforming reactions by steam alone and by CO2 alone were also studied over these catalysts in order to explain the catalyst activity. The Pd–Rh catalyst is superior in a number of ways, including better activity for CH4 and CO2 conversion in spite of much less ingredient loading per unit volume. The Pd–Rh catalyst also exhibited higher syngas production index [(H2 LHV + CO LHV)/(Feed CH4 LHV)], lower syngas H2/CO ratio and coke formation. The results were supported by BET measurement, CO chemisorption and electron microscopy. The experimental results demonstrate that the metal-foam-coated Pd–Rh/(CeZrO2–Al2O3) catalyst performs better for syngas production through steam-biogas reforming compared to the Ru and Ni catalysts.

Keywords
Related Topics
Physical Sciences and Engineering Chemical Engineering Catalysis
Authors
, , , ,