| Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6432617 | Geomorphology | 2014 | 4 Pages |
Abstract
In a short communication, Huang et al. (2013) presented arguments for invalidating the expanded Lane's relation that we proposed in Dust and Wohl (2012) and reproposed their approach for modifying the balance schematic of the Lane's relation that they first proposed in Nanson and Huang (2008). We contend that their arguments do not invalidate any aspect of the expanded Lane's relation that we proposed and find, conversely, key aspects of their proposed alternative approach problematic. We provide detailed counter arguments for their key points regarding our proposed expanded Lane's relation and for their proposed alternative approach.
Related Topics
Physical Sciences and Engineering
Earth and Planetary Sciences
Earth-Surface Processes
Authors
David Dust, Ellen Wohl,
