Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
6438468 | Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta | 2014 | 11 Pages |
Abstract
We demonstrate that mollusc shell temperature calibrations originating from different laboratories that have not been corrected for instrument backgrounds may differ by as much as â¼0.07â° in Î47 over the â¼0 to 30 °C temperature range even where dÎ47/dT agree. Because recent calibrations for Î47 vs. T from several different laboratories agree for bivalved mollusc shells, yet differ from an early calibration for bivalved molluscs, we suggest it is unlikely that temperature-Î47 variability is attributable to phylum-specific vital effects, and instead conclude that differences in calibration slope between phyla and/or inorganic calcite are more easily explained by variability in measurements made in different laboratories. Discrepancies in both calibration slopes and/or intercepts indicate that Î47 values measured in natural materials may be more significantly influenced by instrument-specific effects, as well as effects from sample preparation and handling and purification of CO2 than current techniques are able to correct for, and therefore, temperatures obtained by comparing measurements of Î47 to independently determined calcite calibrations may err by a far greater amount than acknowledged in previous studies.
Related Topics
Physical Sciences and Engineering
Earth and Planetary Sciences
Geochemistry and Petrology
Authors
Daniel A. Petrizzo, Edward D. Young, Bruce N. Runnegar,