Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
6443164 | Earth-Science Reviews | 2012 | 32 Pages |
Abstract
Although the RCS is not a good rock proxy for the conceptual sequence boundary it remains a very mappable surface which may separate facies of potentially very different origin and reservoir quality. The RCS is also inseparable from the SU and typically the only terrestrial erosional surface of extent in most short-duration sequences. Its nullification as a sequence boundary would mean abandonment of depositional sequence stratigraphy as a correlation and interpretive tool within these sections. An alternative to abandonment of the SU as a sequence boundary is to loosen the definition of a sequence boundary to 'a discrete surface of erosional truncation carved landward of contemporary shorelines that is traceable beyond the scale of a single valley or comparable local system, and its correlative surfaces of conformity and/or non-deposition', and continue its use as before.
Related Topics
Physical Sciences and Engineering
Earth and Planetary Sciences
Geology
Authors
John M. Holbrook, Janok P. Bhattacharya,